Topic summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Leadership results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and False Dilemma , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 197 hits . Analysis detected 1,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (15,398 of 23,343 topics). This Executive Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Executive Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst