Topic summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edm Scene results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (8,884 of 22,803 topics). This Edm Scene is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Edm Scene
Topic details
Total words: 1,928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.1%14.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos