Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Development Initiatives results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (18,181 of 23,542 topics). This Economic Development Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Economic Development Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 3,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos