Topic summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos1,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Discrimination Lawsuits results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 3,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,964 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,168 of 22,633 topics). This Discrimination Lawsuits is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Discrimination Lawsuits
Topic details
Total words: 4,964
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos