Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video1,646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Devils Tower National Monument results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (22,199 of 22,944 topics). This Devils Tower National Monument is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Devils Tower National Monument
Topic details
Total words: 6,584
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos