Topic summary
⁠26%2 analyzed articles/videos1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Detroit Tigers results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 1,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (14,993 of 23,522 topics). This Detroit Tigers is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Detroit Tigers
Topic details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos