Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Complete Game results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 1,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (18,341 of 24,100 topics). This Complete Game is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Complete Game
Topic details
Total words: 3,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos