Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Leaders results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 1,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (3,653 of 22,862 topics). This Community Leaders is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Community Leaders
Topic details
Total words: 1,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 24.6%24.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos