Topic summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Commercial Trucking Industry results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 252 hits . Analysis detected 1,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (16,689 of 22,921 topics). This Commercial Trucking Industry is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Commercial Trucking Industry
Topic details
Total words: 4,384
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst