Topic summary
5%1 analyzed article/video792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Impacts results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Recency Bias, and Anecdotal, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.3% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 485 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 7% (19,472 of 20,836 topics). This Climate Impacts is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Climate Impacts
Topic details
Total words: 3,168
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos