Topic summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video1,607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center For Technology Innovation (cti) results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 2,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (20,250 of 23,189 topics). This Center For Technology Innovation (cti) is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Center For Technology Innovation (cti)

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos