Topic summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video1,865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capitalist Efficiency results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,252 hits. Analysis detected 6,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (12,791 of 23,804 topics). This Capitalist Efficiency is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Capitalist Efficiency
Topic details
Total words: 7,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos