Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabis Accessories results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 1,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (12,817 of 22,098 topics). This Cannabis Accessories is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Cannabis Accessories
Topic details
Total words: 2,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos