Topic summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boulder Arts Scene results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 1,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (21,755 of 22,627 topics). This Boulder Arts Scene is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Boulder Arts Scene
Topic details
Total words: 4,480
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos