Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video1,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Baltimore Orioles results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (19,986 of 24,010 topics). This Baltimore Orioles is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Baltimore Orioles
Topic details
Total words: 4,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos