Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Anti Imperialism results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 201 hits. Analysis detected 899 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 20,803 topics). This Anti Imperialism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Anti Imperialism
Topic details
Total words: 1,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 3.1%3.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos