Topic summary
⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Husbandry results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 573 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,084 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (22,653 of 22,721 topics). This Animal Husbandry is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Animal Husbandry
Topic details
Total words: 5,084
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
0.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos