Topic summary
â 54% 1 analyzed article/video 1,187 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Diseases results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 379 hits . Analysis detected 2,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 34% (15,320 of 23,173 topics). This Animal Diseases is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Animal Diseases
Topic details
Total words: 4,748
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst