Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Agricultural Extension Programs results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 1.7% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,482 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 20,836 topics). This Agricultural Extension Programs is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Agricultural Extension Programs
Topic details
Total words: 2,482
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos