Topic summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agricultural Competitions results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 523 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (22,137 of 22,876 topics). This Agricultural Competitions is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Agricultural Competitions
Topic details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos