Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video3,554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These African Football results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,138 hits. Analysis detected 6,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (19,432 of 22,721 topics). This African Football is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
African Football
Topic details
Total words: 14,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos