Topic summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 2,302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adoption Practices results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,108 hits . Analysis detected 3,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (17,355 of 22,885 topics). This Adoption Practices is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Adoption Practices
Topic details
Total words: 9,208
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst