Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Academic Advising results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 234 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,901 topics). This Academic Advising is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Academic Advising
Topic details
Total words: 1,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos