Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zodiac Signs results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 56.4% saturation with 6,799 hits. Analysis detected 20,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,185 of 37,536 keywords). This Zodiac Signs is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Zodiac Signs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%Zodiac Signs (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,048
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.2% percentile
6.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 56.4%56.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 30.5%30.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 25.7%25.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Indoctrination: Keyword 56.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 30.5%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos