Keyword summary
11%1 analyzed article/video1,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zilker Park results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 1,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (34,987 of 37,536 keywords). This Zilker Park is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Zilker Park
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
7%Zilker Park (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos