Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Zero Parades For Dead Spies results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 2,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Zero Parades For Dead Spies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Zero Parades For Dead Spies
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 37.0%37.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 30.9%30.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.3%19.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 37.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos