Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Young Performers results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 673 hits. Analysis detected 5,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,046 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (18,694 of 37,533 keywords). This Young Performers is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Young Performers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠51%Young Performers (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,046
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos