Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These You And I Are Polar Opposites results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Loss Aversion, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (30,707 of 37,536 keywords). This You And I Are Polar Opposites is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
You And I Are Polar Opposites
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510018.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos