Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos4,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Year In Review results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,397 hits. Analysis detected 9,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,346 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,798 of 37,536 keywords). This Year In Review is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Year In Review
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
58%Year In Review (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,346
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.9%14.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos