Keyword summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yang Zhilin results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 2,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,574 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (12,633 of 37,536 keywords). This Yang Zhilin is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Yang Zhilin
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠67%Yang Zhilin (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,574
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos