Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Xinjiang results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Pessimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,315 hits . Analysis detected 6,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,833 keywords). This Xinjiang is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Xinjiang
Keyword details
Total words: 7,848
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst