Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video598 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xiaomi 18 results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 234 hits. Analysis detected 1,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,672 of 37,536 keywords). This Xiaomi 18 is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Xiaomi 18
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Xiaomi 18 (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,392
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos