Keyword summary
8% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These X Men 97 results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 1,459 hits . Analysis detected 3,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,560 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,735 of 37,536 keywords). This X Men 97 is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. X Men 97
Keyword details
Total words: 6,560
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.2% 22.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst