Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Wuhan Institute Of Virology results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 822 hits. Analysis detected 3,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,713 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Wuhan Institute Of Virology is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Wuhan Institute Of Virology
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,713
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos