Keyword summary
11% 2 analyzed articles/videos 826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wta results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hindsight Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 266 hits . Analysis detected 1,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,626 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,076 of 37,536 keywords). This Wta is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Wta
Keyword details
Total words: 4,626
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.6% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 49% 7/24/2026, 9:48:54 AM