Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worldcup results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 65.5% saturation with 1,535 hits . Analysis detected 6,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,605 of 37,536 keywords). This Worldcup is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Worldcup
Keyword details
Total words: 2,344
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.1% percentile 8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 65.5% 65.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 27.8% 27.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 26.5% 26.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 29.5% 29.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 65.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.5%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst