Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These World Trade Organization results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Slippery Slope , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,027 hits . Analysis detected 6,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This World Trade Organization is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. World Trade Organization
Keyword details
Total words: 7,736
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst