Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These World Trade Center results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 587 hits . Analysis detected 2,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,827 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This World Trade Center is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. World Trade Center
Keyword details
Total words: 1,827
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 32.1% 32.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst