Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Food Program results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 2,204 hits . Analysis detected 7,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,518 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,206 of 34,755 keywords). This World Food Program is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. World Food Program
Keyword details
Total words: 4,518
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.9% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 48.8% 48.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 32.8% 32.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Keyword 48.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 32.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 28.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst