Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Cup Usmnt Belgium Tv Record results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 327 hits. Analysis detected 1,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (21,997 of 37,536 keywords). This World Cup Usmnt Belgium Tv Record is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
World Cup Usmnt Belgium Tv Record
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,284
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos