Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These World Cup Boston results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 279 hits . Analysis detected 1,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This World Cup Boston is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. World Cup Boston
Keyword details
Total words: 1,448
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst