Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Central Kitchen results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 1,394 hits. Analysis detected 7,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,550 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (10,974 of 37,536 keywords). This World Central Kitchen is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
World Central Kitchen
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠71%World Central Kitchen (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,550
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 24.5%24.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 25.1%25.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.9%11.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 25.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos