Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Baseball Classic results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 590 hits . Analysis detected 2,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,750 of 37,536 keywords). This World Baseball Classic is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. World Baseball Classic
Keyword details
Total words: 1,764
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.0% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 33.5% 33.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Keyword 33.5%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Red Herring: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.6% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst