Keyword summary
16%2 analyzed articles/videos764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workforce Pell results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (54,305 of 56,044 keywords). This Workforce Pell is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Workforce Pell
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
4%Workforce Pell (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos