Keyword summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workforce Development Bastrop results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 210 hits . Analysis detected 918 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (22,252 of 55,476 keywords). This Workforce Development Bastrop is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Workforce Development Bastrop
Keyword details
Total words: 1,812
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Red Herring: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst