Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Womenâs History results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , In-Group Bias , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 314 hits . Analysis detected 1,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of â 77% (8,052 of 34,536 keywords). This Womenâs History is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Womenâs History
Keyword details
Total words: 1,684
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.7% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst