Keyword summary
87% 2 analyzed articles/videos 656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Witches results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 379 hits . Analysis detected 2,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,214 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,598 of 37,536 keywords). This Witches is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Witches
Keyword details
Total words: 3,214
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst