Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Willow Project results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 1,202 hits . Analysis detected 6,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (14,007 of 37,536 keywords). This Willow Project is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Willow Project
Keyword details
Total words: 5,224
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 23.0% 23.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst