Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Williamsburg results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 340 hits . Analysis detected 2,135 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Williamsburg is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Williamsburg
Keyword details
Total words: 2,680
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst