Keyword summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Tong results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 622 hits . Analysis detected 4,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,506 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,154 of 37,536 keywords). This William Tong is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. William Tong
Keyword details
Total words: 4,506
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst